đ© THE OPENING POSITION
Howdy, Margineers! Marginheads? I havenât figured out a nickname for you yet, but rest assured, as the resident social media manager/chaos agent around here, Iâm determined to find one worthy of going viral â or at least worth a spot in the âList of fandom namesâ wiki. (Wait, Coldplay fans really just call themselves Coldplayers? Câmon. We can do better.)
Itâs been an eventful week with the start of May and the end of the Raptorsâ playoff run (sigh⊠at least weâll always have RJâs buzzer-beater đ„Č), but in brighter news for basketball fans, the Toronto Tempo, the cityâs new WNBA team, starts their first regular season tonight. A new pro sports team brings the opportunity to crowdsource a new mascot, and thus an opportunity for ideas to go hilariously off the rails. There were many calls for a metronome (get it?!), which led the team to respond with the Metro Gnome⊠which they claimed was a joke, but is actually kind of incredible? As of press time, thereâs still no decision, but with enough public support, maybe we can still make this happen. GnomeHive, where you at?
â Shazia Khan, Social Media Strategy Manager
đ BEFORE THE BELL
Index | Week (May 4â7, 2026) |
TSX | âČ +4.28 (0.01%) |
S&P 500 | âČ +106.31 (1.47%) |
Nasdaq | âČ +694.46 (2.77%) |
Dow | âČ +180.59 (0.37%) |
The takeaway: A divergence in North American markets saw the Nasdaq and S&P 500 surge on the back of massive AI capital expenditure and blowout earnings from tech giants like AMD (NASDAQ: AMD), which was up 13.14%. The TSX, however, finished the period virtually flat. While hopes for a US-Iran peace deal initially eased inflation fears and boosted Canadian banks and miners, the resulting $10 slide in crude oil prices acted as an anchor on the energy-heavy index. Whereas US markets remain insulated by "hyperscaler" spending, Canadaâs reliance on the energy sector (which fell nearly 4% this week) continues to cap its upside whenever geopolitical tensions cool.
đ THE CONTEXT
Macklem warns rate hikes are back on the table

Photo credit: NurPhoto/Getty Images/The Margin Staff
The Bank of Canadaâs overnight rate has been holding steady at 2.25% since October 2025, so nobody was very surprised when it held the rate again last week. But people did take notice when Governor Tiff Macklem testified before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance this past Monday and warned that if oil prices stay high and start affecting broader inflation, "there may be a need for consecutive increases in the policy rate." One increase would be newsworthy; consecutive increases would be a whole thing.
The problem is that the economy is pulling in two directions at once. Gas prices spiked more than 21% from February to March, shoving the Consumer Price Index from 1.8% to 2.4%. But US tariffs are still affecting exports and business investment, and the unemployment rate is currently sitting at 6.7%. So raising rates fights inflation, but hurts growth; lowering rates does the opposite. Thereâs no easy way through, which is probably why Macklem testified that monetary policy may need to be ânimble.â
Itâs not time to panic just yet, though. Macklem didnât say hikes are coming, just that uncertainty is âunusually elevated.â Which is basically a very central-bank way of saying that nobody knows whatâs going to happen, not even the Bank of Canada.
What this meansâŠ
For variable-rate mortgage holders: Core inflationâs still sitting at a fairly reasonable 2.3%, which is why the Bank can argue the gas price spike is temporary and keep rates the same. If gas prices start affecting other goods, though, that could change quickly. The BoCâs next announcement comes on June 10 â it might be worth having a conversation with your broker before then.
For investors: The 10-year Government of Canada yield recently rose 10 basis points, a sign that bond markets are considering inflation risk even as the BoC holds steady. Thatâs not great for rate-sensitive sectors like Real Estate Investment Trusts and utilities, since investors can increasingly get bond-like returns from, well, bonds. Higher energy prices will benefit energy producers (congrats, Alberta), but for everyone else, itâll mostly show up at the gas pump.
Also:
Ottawa throws $1.5B at the tariff problem: This week, the federal government announced a new $1 billion Business Development Bank of Canada lending program for steel, aluminum, and copper manufacturers hit by US tariffs, plus another $500 million for SMEs through the Regional Tariff Response Initiative. It's the latest in a series of federal responses to US trade pressure, and with the CUSMA review coming up this summer, probably not the last.
GameStop tries to buy eBay: Yes, really. The meme stock that wouldnât die made an unsolicited $55.5 billion offer for eBay this week â a company nearly four times its size, which had zero prior contact with GameStop before receiving the proposal. GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen went on CNBC to explain the financing and was asked twice where the money would come from. Each time he simply replied: âI don't understand your question." Tyler broke it down for us on TikTok.
Shopify exceeds expectations; stock drops anyway: Shopify had its strongest quarter in four years, reporting 34% revenue growth and GMV over $100 billion. And yet! The stock still fell 7% because the companyâs outlook for the next quarter came in below what analysts were expecting.
đ€ż ROLLING IN THE DEEP

Photo credit: 20th Century Studios
"Everybody wants this": What it actually costs to be Miranda Priestly
by Samantha Emann
This is an excerpt of an article originally run in full on The Margin.
Miranda Priestly has never needed a sequel, and yet here we are. The Devil Wears Prada 2 hits theatres last week, and if the trailers are any indication, the editor-in-chief of Runway magazine is still terrifying, still impeccably dressed, and still the only person who can make "that's all" sound like a threat. And she's still â presumably â very well paid.
So how much does Miranda's job actually pay, and how much does it cost to keep? The fantasy has always been about proximity to beauty, taste, and power, but the reality looks a lot more like a balance sheet.
Anna Wintour is, by most accounts, the real-world Miranda Priestly â the longtime editor-in-chief of Vogue is the acknowledged inspiration for the character, and the closest proxy we have for what that job actually pays. At her peak, Wintour reportedly earned between US$2 million and US$4 million annually during her 37-year tenure at the magazine, not to mention a US$200,000 clothing allowance, a private car and driver, among a number of other perks. While the actual level of her net worth is little more than an educated guess, it's been estimated to be between US$30 million and US$50 million.
Yes, that's a huge amount of money â on paper, that salary basically justifies the terrifying, imperious energy Miranda perfected back in 2005 when the OG movie came out.
But compared to Wintour's cultural footprint, it's also surprisingly small. Thirty-seven years as the arbiter of global taste, and the salary is something a mid-level tech executive could earn in a single year. Has the job always been more about power and prestige than actual profit?
|
đ UNSOLICITED OPINIONS

Photo credit: Unsplash/Alexander Shatov/Nano Banana Pro/The Margin Staff
Tweets can be good, actually
Shazia Khan, Social Media Strategy Manager: Thanks to the Musk v. Altman trial, I've been rediscovering one of my favourite niche internet experiences: the art of the live-tweeted courtroom drama. Cameras are typically banned in courts, but text-based reporting isn't, and some journalists have developed a real knack for distilling dense legal proceedings into pithy, perfectly-timed, 240-character dispatches.Â
If the minutiae of court procedure sounds dry on paper, I hear you â Iâm the type of person whoâs read federal lawsuits and depositions for fun, so I may not be normal. But thankfully, the best tweeters know that what most people want isn't just the legalese, but the absurd, unscripted human moments buried inside it. Like when a judge roasts a powerful billionaire, or when everyone in the overflow room is scrambling for lunch ideas during recess.
Luckily, a handful of reporters out there â specifically Mike Isaac at The New York Times and Liz Lopatto at The Verge â are keeping the magic of courtroom live-tweets alive while covering Musk and Altmanâs slap fight. Theyâve had me feeling nostalgic for the golden era of Twitter, when a random thread could turn into a monoculture moment. Anyone remember the Zola story? Or when Kanye came sideways at Wiz Khalifa out of nowhere?
The shift of Twitter into X (not to mention the rise of "For You" algorithms everywhere) kinda wrecked the thrill of watching something unfold one post at a time with thousands of strangers. Iâm still a little sad about it â but maybe, as long as big-tech boys continue to throw spurious lawsuits at each other, we can still look forward to funny, dedicated courtroom reporters whoâll make A+ content out of it.
đ§Ÿ INSIDER TRADING
From The Margin group chat:

đČ UNHEDGED
Last week, we asked for the best advice youâve ever heard from a boss. Our favourite responses:
âModelling the good behaviour leads to better outcomes than policing the bad behaviour.â â Luca D.
âTry out anything and everything youâre interested in, even just as a hobby that you donât think will lead anywhere. You never know what skills or knowledge will come in handy down the road.â â Anne V.
This week, we want you to answer: What money habit did you inherit (good or bad)?
Send your responses to [email protected] by next Thursday, May 14 at 12 p.m. ET â if we like it, we might feature it in next week's issue.
If you liked this newsletter, hated this newsletter, or are totally indifferent to it, hit the reply button and tell us why! Weâre so lonely.
This weekâs contributors: Samantha Emann (writer), Tyler Haw (audience engagement), Douglas Dunlop (content lead), Jenna Zaitchik (senior creative designer), Shazia Khan (social media strategy manager), Kat Angus (deputy editor), and Eric Wainwright (editor in chief).
Important Legal Disclosures
"The Margin" is a financial news and media platform published by QuestMedia Inc. and is a member of the Questrade Group of Companies. Questrade Group of Companies means Questrade Financial Group and its affiliates that provide deposit, investment, loan, securities, mortgages and other products or services. Our editorial team operates independently, though "The Margin" may promote Questrade services and receive promotional benefits when users click provided links or open accounts.
Not Investment Advice & Risk Warning: All content is for informational and educational purposes only. "The Margin" is not a registered investment adviser or broker-dealer. Nothing published constitutes a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell any security, or to engage in any investment strategy. Trading securitiesâespecially on marginâinvolves significant risk and can result in the loss of your entire investment. Please consult a qualified financial or tax professional before making any investment decisions.
Limitation of Liability: Content and market data are provided "as is" without warranties of any kind. "The Margin" and its affiliates assume no liability for your trading results or data inaccuracies. Contributors to "The Margin" may hold positions in the securities discussed.
Your personal information is handled in accordance with the Questrade Financial Group Privacy Policy. You may withdraw your consent to receive these emails at any time by clicking "unsubscribe."


